Ryan Dickerson vs Alexander Razeghi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Scrutinizing recent performance, Dickerson's second serve has fetched a success rate of 45%, slightly edging out Razeghi's 40.91%. Does this give Dickerson a minor advantage? Possibly, as this stat frequently correlates with match outcomes.
• In the return game, Dickerson has claimed 48.48% of points against opponent's second serves, outpacing Razeghi's 42.5%. Meanwhile, first serve return stats are strikingly close, at 29.07% and 28.98% respectively, potentially benefiting Dickerson.
• Examining pressure situations, Razeghi impressively saves 62.16% of breakpoints compared to Dickerson's 53.85%. Can this resilience under pressure shift the match in Razeghi's favor?
• In the past year, Dickerson has a win rate of 58.14% across their 43 matches, while Razeghi boasts an impressive 80%, despite fewer matches. Which stat is more indicative of current form?
• On different surfaces, Dickerson excels on clay with a win rate of 63%, whereas Razeghi's forte is indoor hard courts, winning 67%. Both show weaknesses on their opposing surfaces, influencing the match dynamics depending on court type.
• Both players participate in similar levels of competition, though Razeghi has demonstrated superior match win percentage at the ITF $10Ks, winning 80% compared to Dickerson's 58.14%.
• Reviewing opponent quality, Dickerson and Razeghi have battled competitors of almost equal ranks, around 234 for Dickerson and 236.8 for Razeghi, presenting a level field in this respect.
• In high stakes scenarios, Dickerson has triumphed in 27% of deciding sets faced, a vital edge over Razeghi, who has not won any such sets, which could be crucial if the match is tightly contested.
• Conversion metrics show Dickerson converting 37.86% of breakpoints, providing a slight edge over Razeghi's 33.33%, impacting betting strategies during breakpoint opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (July 18, 2025, UTC):

The tennis match between Dickerson and Razeghi offers intriguing dynamics based on their statistical performance over the last year.

While Dickerson shows strength in second serve and return statistics, a key area of potential dominance arises in deciding set performance, which could be pivotal if the contest is closely fought.

Alternatively, Razeghi's superior breakpoint saving rate under pressure indicates resilience, a critical factor when facing high-pressure situations throughout the match.

Surface preferences could split the advantage; Dickerson flourishes on clay, whereas Razeghi excels on indoor hard courts. The match’s surface will significantly influence each player's expected performance.

Having reviewed the stats and performances, Dickerson holds a slight advantage with key second serve efficiencies and deciding set potential. Therefore, Dickerson is more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.